Paul
2011-12-02 06:51:03 UTC
Hi,
at this time I dive into cicuitikz. Anyway, I've got a problem with the
defaults:
Voltage drops are counted positive which means the voltage arrow in the
pictures goes from + to -, where the current flows.
\begin{ circuitikz }
\draw (0,0) to [R=$R_1$, i =$i _1$, v=$v_1$] (2,0);
\end{ circuitikz }
shows a voltage drop (following the current direction) from + to -.
Following the convention mentioned above, the arrow should go from left
to right as the current flows. The same with voltage sources!!!
Now the american style:
\begin{ circuitikz }[american voltages]
\draw (0,0) to [V=$a_1$] (2,0);
\end{ circuitikz }
vs. the european style. The voltage direction differs also.
These finaly problem is that I can't simply change the american/european
style globaly without changing the equations (or even arrows)!
Is it a bug, intentionally or I'm wrong?
Thanks,
Paul
at this time I dive into cicuitikz. Anyway, I've got a problem with the
defaults:
Voltage drops are counted positive which means the voltage arrow in the
pictures goes from + to -, where the current flows.
\begin{ circuitikz }
\draw (0,0) to [R=$R_1$, i =$i _1$, v=$v_1$] (2,0);
\end{ circuitikz }
shows a voltage drop (following the current direction) from + to -.
Following the convention mentioned above, the arrow should go from left
to right as the current flows. The same with voltage sources!!!
Now the american style:
\begin{ circuitikz }[american voltages]
\draw (0,0) to [V=$a_1$] (2,0);
\end{ circuitikz }
vs. the european style. The voltage direction differs also.
These finaly problem is that I can't simply change the american/european
style globaly without changing the equations (or even arrows)!
Is it a bug, intentionally or I'm wrong?
Thanks,
Paul